develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2001

Re: References in @INC

Thread Previous
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
March 30, 2001 13:50
Subject:
Re: References in @INC
Message ID:
20010330225021.C82281@plum.flirble.org
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 04:45:47PM -0500, Benjamin Sugars wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> 
> > Please feel free to change the current implementation of the coderef filter
> > sub to something that isn't subtly broken too.
> > Anyone thought further about whether something like Filter::Simple would be
> > better?
> 
> My first thought -- before even getting to the implementation -- is that
> the name of the method in the case of an object reference should be
> REQUIRE or USE or something.  Having INC forced into main is annoying.

I agree about &INC being forced into main being a pain. However, I couldn't
think of another name that I liked better than INC for the method.
[Not that I stopped to think for that long]

Nicholas Clark
-- 
ENOJOB: http://plum.flirble.org/~nick/CV.html

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About