[DOC PATCH bleadperl] Two nits in perlhack.pod

I decided to rsync bleadperl and so read part of perlhack. One
small typo caught my eye, and another nit about perlbug. It
seems to me that perlbug@perl.org is the preferred vehicle
nowadays, so I decided to put it first.

Cheers,
Philip

--- perlhack.pod.orig   Thu Mar 29 15:41:27 2001
+++ perlhack.pod        Fri Mar 30 17:00:14 2001
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@
 excellent point to start with when choosing to use the 'rsync the
 patches' scheme. Starting with perl@7582, which means a set of source
 files on which the latest applied patch is number 7582, you apply all
-succeeding patches available from than on (7583, 7584, ...).
+succeeding patches available from then on (7583, 7584, ...).

 You can use the patches later as a kind of search archive.

@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@

 To report a bug in Perl, use the program I<perlbug> which comes with
 Perl (if you can't get Perl to work, send mail to the address
-I<perlbug@perl.com> or I<perlbug@perl.org>).  Reporting bugs through
+I<perlbug@perl.org> or I<perlbug@perl.com>).  Reporting bugs through
 I<perlbug> feeds into the automated bug-tracking system, access to
 which is provided through the web at I<http://bugs.perl.org/>.  It
 often pays to check the archives of the perl5-porters mailing list to
End of patch.

-- 
Philip Newton <pnewton@gmx.de>
I appreciate copies of replies to my messages to Perl5 lists.

• [DOC PATCH bleadperl] Two nits in perlhack.pod by Philip Newton