develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2001

Re: pods patched

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Michael Stevens
March 17, 2001 16:30
Re: pods patched
Message ID:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 02:55:23PM -0500, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> And why the movement of POD from after __END__ to front, when it will
> slow-down calculation (see ExtUtils/

In that case, I wanted pod parsers to pick up the documentation
for perl_archive_after. Quick testing with perldoc showed that
this didn't seem to make it into generated man pages. I could
have moved the perl_archive_after stuff to the end of the file, but
I tend to agree with having function docs with the code, so I left
it there and rearranged the rest of the pod. I'm *fairly* sure that
the =item for perl_archive_after wasn't in a list of any kind. 
I can't double-check, because I don't have a version of the source
handy that had perl_archive_after in and didn't have my
changes, so my claims about what things were like beforehand may
be wrong.


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About