develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2001

Re: pods patched

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
March 17, 2001 08:13
Subject:
Re: pods patched
Message ID:
20010317101318.S10215@chaos.wustl.edu
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 05:07:09PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> [Quoting Jarkko Hietaniemi, on March 17 2001, 09:49, in "Re: pods patched"]
> > Okay, since we seem to be able to disagree even on two bytes
> > ("=over" vs "=over 4"), I'm going to retract at least the changes
> > made to Ilya's and Neil's modules.  Any others? (notice Reply-To)
> 
> I don't mind the change, but I _do_ mind all these POD nuisances. 
> 
> CamelIII clearly states that the number argument to =over is optional,
> so it is obvious that the Pod::Checker needs to be fixed. How come it
> needs so much discussion?

<sigh, adding to that discussion :-)>

Michael Stevens just supplied a patch for Pod::Checker to be more
relaxed.  If noone objects to it (ha!) I'll also apply that.

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About