Re: [ID 20000913.003] Closing STDERR leaves fd(2) marked w/o?

On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:15:15 CST, Warren Hyde wrote:
>The problem of warn/die messages going to descriptor 2 does not exist in
>5.6.1-TRIAL2.

Good.

>However 5.6.1-TRIAL2 still has the problem of printing a
>warning about "Filehandle FOOBAR opened only for output..." if FOOBAR
>happens to get descriptor 1 or 2 (after closing STDOUT/STDERR).

It should be easy not to ask for warnings. ;-)

Patch for fixing it welcome, but I wouldn't expect to see it in 5.6.x
before 5.6.2.  I'm enforcing a code-freeze for 5.6.1 in an effort to
get it out as soon as we possibly can, which translates to "critical
bugfixes and documentation patches only".

Thanks.


Sarathy
gsar@ActiveState.com

• [ID 20000913.003] Closing STDERR leaves fd(2) marked w/o? by whyde
• Re: [ID 20000913.003] Closing STDERR leaves fd(2) marked w/o? by Warren Hyde
• Re: [ID 20000913.003] Closing STDERR leaves fd(2) marked w/o? by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [ID 20000913.003] Closing STDERR leaves fd(2) marked w/o? by Warren Hyde
• Re: [ID 20000913.003] Closing STDERR leaves fd(2) marked w/o? by Gurusamy Sarathy