develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2001

Re: Perl-Unicode fundamentals

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
February 21, 2001 15:47
Subject:
Re: Perl-Unicode fundamentals
Message ID:
20010221234642.A18472@pembro26.pmb.ox.ac.uk
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 06:35:19PM -0500, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
> I supplied this list many times already.  Cannot make it definite now,
> just some things:

OK: just a thought - this has gone pretty much far enough now. Nick and I have
agreed on a model which settles our differences, and which is also extremely
close to your model, and Jarkko is also going to agree to it. (Aren't you
Jarkko? :)

Under the new scheme, yes, some of the things you mention are "broken", and
will need to be changed; some of them, however, are merely stylistic
differences, and since there's no accounting for taste, it's pointless to
argue about them.

So, I think 
    1) We're so almost there, there's no much left to *usefully* discuss.
       Let's hang on until Nick comes out with a consolidated plan.
    2) we really ought to get this away from P5P, before it gets nasty. 
       It has got reasonably close, from most parties involved.

-- 
"There is no safe investment. To love at all is to be vulnerable. ... 
The only place outside Heaven where you can be perfectly safe from all the
dangers and pertubations of love is Hell."
                         -CS Lewis "The Four Loves"

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About