develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2001

Re: IV preservation (was Re: [PATCH 5.7.0] compiling on OS/2)

From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
February 16, 2001 15:11
Subject:
Re: IV preservation (was Re: [PATCH 5.7.0] compiling on OS/2)
Message ID:
20010216171122.A6500@chaos.wustl.edu
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:47:39PM +0000, nick@ing-simmons.net wrote:
> Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> writes:
> >> Given transparency, you do not need such a thing.
> >
> >Wrong.  
> 
> I am (as you know already) on Ilya's "side" here...

I have no problem with someone producing a better model or a new
implementation.  I do have somewhat of a problem (because there's only
one me :-) with people suggesting such things and showing neither the
code, nor detailed description of the new model (otherwise discussing
the new model is bumping in the dark).  Write down two "simple" things:
the model and the code.

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About