On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:59:27PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > I don't agree that it makes the *approach* deserving of rejection. > > > The implementation, yes. (in that the implementation needs to be perfect) > > > It was not intended never to cache the NV value if the NV value was > > > calculated from the string. I'm afraid my reply to that was not relevant. I'm afraid I'm (was?) lost in your multiple negatives. [I thought that your "never" relates to how things were done before your patch.] IlyaThread Previous | Thread Next