Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2001
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:54:57PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > I checked one line of the code only - one where the segfault is > > happening on OS/2 (this segfault might be attributed to video drivers, > > so might be not Perl fault). This one line indicates that when NV is > > used in the IV/Uv context, the converted value is not cached. > > > > This line alone makes the approach deserving rejection. > > I don't agree that it makes the *approach* deserving of rejection. > The implementation, yes. (in that the implementation needs to be perfect) > It was not intended never to cache the NV value if the NV value was > calculated from the string. perl5.6.0 -MDevel::Peek -wle '$a = shift; $b = $a+1; Dump $a' 12 Name "main::b" used only once: possible typo at -e line 1. SV = PVNV(0x11aea8) at 0x13ea38 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (NOK,POK,pNOK,pPOK) IV = 0 NV = 12 PV = 0x1190a8 "12"\0 CUR = 2 LEN = 3 Enough said. IlyaThread Previous | Thread Next