develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: [ID 20010131.008] Not OK: perl v5.6.1 +v5.6.1-TRIAL2 on alpha-linux 2.2.5-16 (UNINSTALLED)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
January 31, 2001 09:57
Subject:
Re: [ID 20010131.008] Not OK: perl v5.6.1 +v5.6.1-TRIAL2 on alpha-linux 2.2.5-16 (UNINSTALLED)
Message ID:
20010131115651.T20543@chaos.wustl.edu
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 05:22:58PM -0000, simon@straylight.eu.org wrote:
> This is a build failure report for perl from simon@straylight.eu.org,
> generated with the help of perlbug 1.33 running under perl v5.6.1.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> [Please enter your report here]
> 
> Urgh.
> 
> op/numconvert.......skipped: unsigned perl arithmetic is not sane (common in 64-bit platforms)
> op/pat..............FAILED tests 101-102
> op/regexp...........FAILED tests 335-337, 429-433, 438, 442, 446-447, 450-452, 777
> op/regexp_noamp.....FAILED tests 335-337, 429-433, 438, 442, 447, 451, 777
>
> lib/bigfltpm........dubious
> 	Test returned status 0 (wstat 136, 0x88)
> 	test program seems to have generated a core
> DIED. FAILED tests 351-362

Since I have proof that neither alpha as such nor linux as such have
problems with T2 I'd glare at gcc first.  Try dropping the optimization
level.

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About