develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: [PATCH] pod/perlclib.pod - Replacements for C library functions

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
January 31, 2001 07:27
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] pod/perlclib.pod - Replacements for C library functions
Message ID:
20010131152656.A1050@pembro26.pmb.ox.ac.uk
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:09:44PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I don't think we're warning in any way for the case where the user configures
> with long doubles, but we can't fake a long double Atof:
> [snip]
> By "should" I mean anything that can go wrong will go wrong
> We cannot be 100% certain that we have Strtol and Strtoul defined, but if
> you don't have them, it's probably the least of your problems
> [you've probably already been told to find an ANSI compiler]

Excuse me being stupid again, but... does that mean what I've written
needs to change, and if so how?

-- 
"You can have my Unix system when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers."

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About