develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: gethostbyname (was Re: Does perl really need to usesigsetjmp? (18% performance hit))

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
January 26, 2001 14:43
Subject:
Re: gethostbyname (was Re: Does perl really need to usesigsetjmp? (18% performance hit))
Message ID:
5.0.2.1.0.20010126173937.01e621e8@24.8.96.48
At 10:38 PM 1/26/2001 +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 02:40:05PM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > It depends on your platform--some have threadsafe gethost* calls and 
> don't
> > > need the _r version, and some don't. (And some aren't threadsafe but 
> don't
> > > have _r versions...)
> >
> > And don't foolishly think that there is only one set of _r variants
> > out there.  There are several different signatures for getpwnam_r,
> > for example.
> >
> > > It's pretty much a crapshoot, unfortunately.
> >
> > Alan would drop -shoot :-)
>
>Alan has expressed his feelings on C++, Perl's "API" and the implementation
>of threads most everywhere. Dan doesn't like C, and I'm starting to agree.
>Jarkko and I both despise the standards committee for long long in C99
>(but I think I start to understand how a standards committee works, and hence
>can see why it happens)
>Is there any language we actually all like? :-)

Well, there's perl... :)

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About