Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> writes: >On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:09:59PM +0100, abigail@foad.org wrote: >> I've recently started building bleedperls with -Duseperlio (next to >> variants without them). And it took me a few days of pondering why >> perl -V of the version I build without -Duseperlio reported they were >> build with -Duseperlio. >> >> Then it dawned to me that perl -V gets its information from Config.pm, >> which is in the architecture dependent library, whose name is identical >> for builds with and without -Duseperlio. > >Well, for now I'll tack on the -perlio so that we can see the >difference better/quicker, but at some point the plan was to start >using perlio by default, should we then drop the -perlio and start >attaching -stdio? Why not make this the excuse to make the switch ;-) -- Nick Ing-Simmons <nik@tiuk.ti.com> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.Thread Previous | Thread Next