develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: Does perl really need to use sigsetjmp? (18% performancehit)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
January 21, 2001 13:21
Subject:
Re: Does perl really need to use sigsetjmp? (18% performancehit)
Message ID:
5.0.2.1.0.20010121161927.01ebd970@24.8.96.48
At 02:06 PM 1/21/01 +0000, Alan Burlison wrote:
>Whenever the subject of threads, mutexes etc in perl come up there
>always seems to be suggestions that V1 of whatever is being proposed
>should be some unutterably complex monster with all sorts of handwavery
>magic going on behind the scenes to 'make life easier for the
>programmer'.

The only thing I can think of that we can do to truly "make life easier for 
the programmer" is to fail to die horribly when someone screws up their 
locking, and possibly add some debugging/monitoring stuff for user-level 
locks and threads. (I have finally seen the error of my ways... :)

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About