Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2001
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 08:36:54PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:34:20PM +0100, abigail@foad.org wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 06:47:06PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > > > > > Would it be possible for you to build release perl 5.7.0 with long doubles > > > and no 64 bit ints, run the current 14 test op/int.t and send the results? > > > My hunch is that you will see the same failures on 5.7.0, and possibly > > > also 5.6.0 (if that allows long doubles) > > > > > > Same errors with the released 5.7.0. > > Cool. Thanks. > > > $ ./perl -I../lib ~abigail/Src/perl/t/op/int.t > > 1..14 > > ok 1 > > ok 2 > > ok 3 > > ok 4 > > ok 5 > > ok 6 > > ok 7 > > not ok 8 # int(4294967303.15) is 4294967302, not 4294967303 > > not ok 9 # int(4294967303.15) is -4294967302, not -4294967303 > > ok 10 > > ok 11 > > ok 12 > > ok 13 > > ok 14 > > Now what? I've no idea how to chase this further, let alone work round > whatever the problem is and solve it. I'm currently downloading glibc-2.2.1. I'll try to install it tonight or this weekend, and see whether that solves the problem. If it does, it's very likely to be a glibc problem. AbigailThread Previous | Thread Next