develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: Multiple post(inc|dec)rement

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Michael Stevens
Date:
January 17, 2001 06:09
Subject:
Re: Multiple post(inc|dec)rement
Message ID:
20010117140848.A23607@firedrake.org
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:21:34PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Stephen McCamant <smcc@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> writes:
> > IMHO, pp_pre(inc|dec) were written the way they are now for a reason
> > (namely efficiency), and it isn't worth slowing them down just to make 
> > some pathological examples more intuitive.
> And, my dear Stephen, how much is the slowdown for an average Perl
> program?

If you could give us the url to the average perl program, we can quickly
and easily test this.

Michael

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About