develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: [PATCH #3 @8436] Re: Eliminate op_children

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
January 16, 2001 10:20
Subject:
Re: [PATCH #3 @8436] Re: Eliminate op_children
Message ID:
20010116122026.I21189@chaos.wustl.edu
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 05:14:37PM -0800, Stephen McCamant wrote:
> >>>>> "JHi" == Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> writes:
> 
> >> >>>>> "SMcC" == Stephen McCamant <smcc@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> writes:
> SMcC> This a finished version of a change I started working quite a
> SMcC> while ago -- getting rid of the op_children field in
> 
> JHi> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:23:56AM -0800, Stephen McCamant wrote:
> SMcC> I guess I shouldn't be patching this late at night -- I forgot the
> SMcC> changes to B::C, appended.
> 
> JHi> B.xs.
> 
> Uh, yeah. This one I had already written (and I even alluded it in the
> text of my first message), I just forgot it while making the patch.
> This should fix B::Debug (as well as any other random B:: modules that 
> look at $op->children, which is more important).

Thanks, applied. (In the 8453 snapshot.)

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About