develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: [PATCH @8436] Re: Eliminate op_children

Thread Previous
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
January 15, 2001 05:17
Subject:
Re: [PATCH @8436] Re: Eliminate op_children
Message ID:
20010115071645.D17847@chaos.wustl.edu
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:07:41AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 03:23:56AM -0800, Stephen McCamant wrote:
> > >>>>> "SMcC" == Stephen McCamant <smcc@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> writes:
> > 
> > SMcC> This a finished version of a change I started working quite a
> > SMcC> while ago -- getting rid of the op_children field in
> > 
> > I guess I shouldn't be patching this late at night -- I forgot the
> > changes to B::C, appended.
> 
> B.xs.

Hrrrm.  I removed the op_children code from B.xs and now B::Debug
is failing on b.t #11:

not ok 11
Can't locate object method "children" via package "B::LISTOP" (perhaps you forgot to load "B::LISTOP"?) at ../lib/B/Debug.pm line 45.
CHECK failed--call queue aborted.
LISTOP (0x140003b80)
        op_next         0x0
        op_sibling      0x0
        op_ppaddr       PL_ppaddr[OP_LEAVE]
        op_targ         0
        op_type         178
        op_seq          6199
        op_flags        13
        op_private      64
        op_first        0x140017140
        op_last         0x1400170e0

Must B::Debug be debugged, too?

> -- 
> $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
>         # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
>         # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About