Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2001
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:08:12PM -0800, Stephen McCamant wrote:
> * Checking for real syntactic lvalue-ness significantly narrows the
> range of what subs can be lvalues.
Hold on, you're not actually doing that. I don't see what you're doing that
affects it, and if you are doing something that affects it, stop. :)
This patch looks to be going very much in the right direction, on the whole.
> - case OP_RETURN:
> - if (o->op_next && o->op_next->op_type != OP_LEAVESUBLV) {
> - o->op_seq = PL_op_seqmax++;
> - break;
> - }
> - /* FALL THROUGH */
Uhm, why have you done that?
> + if (cxstack[cxix].blk_sub.lval && CvLVALUE(cxstack[cxix].blk_sub.cv))
> + return cxstack[cxix].blk_sub.lval;
return 1?
Apart from that, it looks great. *Looks* great. Obviously we don't want the
subfaults... :)
--
BITTERNESS:
Never be Afraid to Share Your Dreams with the World,
Because there's Nothing the World Loves More Than The Taste of
Really Sweet Dreams http://www.despair.com
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next