On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:15:01AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:53:47PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > > >>>>> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:28:52 +0100 , "Roca, Ignasi" <ignasi.roca@fujitsu.siemens.es> said: > > > > > Strings with \x{..} in the middle are corrupted, test 22 of op/bop.t fails. > > > This happens in the paragrah that recodes what is accumulated before first > > > \x{...}. > > > > FWIW, op/bop.t doesn't fail for me with patches upto 8327 neither > > before nor after your patch. Maybe you can think of another test that > > Maybe something to do with ASCIIish assumptions (didn't look at the > patch yet, so I'm guessing)? Mr. Ignasi hails from EBCDIC lands. Yes, it seems that the code once again assumed ASCII encoding, the raw & 0x80 tells us that. I actually already had changed that to be abstracted behind a macro, UTF8_IS_CONTINUED(). Next we'll need to define these macros in EBCDIC correctly (mapping to ASCII and back). Simon Cozens already had some patches to this effect a few weeks back, I'll go dig. > > would fail for me? > > > > BTW, the patch arrived here line-wrapped. I fixed that manually and > > applied with -l. Maybe you should resubmit as an attachment and > > include your perl -V. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack CohenThread Previous