develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2001

Re: New attempt on hints/solaris_2.sh

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Alan Burlison
Date:
January 1, 2001 15:59
Subject:
Re: New attempt on hints/solaris_2.sh
Message ID:
3A5119C5.3C2EF46B@uk.sun.com
Lupe Christoph wrote:

> > -Duse64bitall fails with the usual EBCDIC nonsense.
> 
> Gremlins! (Jarkko, this can't be just rats.)
> 
> Can you please run Configure with "sh -x" and mail me the trace?
> The Bandwidth Conservation Society asks to send it gzipped ;-)

It's a CWD problem in solaris_2.sh, here's a diff:

*** ../../../src/solaris_2.sh   Fri Dec 29 12:10:26 2000
--- solaris_2.sh        Mon Jan  1 23:54:48 2001
***************
*** 464,470 ****
  EOM
                exit 1
            fi
!           . ./workshoplibpth.cbu
            case "$cc -v 2>/dev/null" in
            *gcc*)
                echo 'main() { return 0; }' > try.c
--- 464,470 ----
  EOM
                exit 1
            fi
!           . ./UU/workshoplibpth.cbu
            case "$cc -v 2>/dev/null" in
            *gcc*)
                echo 'main() { return 0; }' > try.c

I'll see how much further I get with this in place...
 
> > > Alan, the bug 4117946 this tests for has been labelled "Integrated
> > > in Releases: s998_15". Is that Solaris 7? The test program you put
> > > in the bug report works OK on my Solaris 8. I'd like to update the
> > > hints script with more up to date information.
> 
> > Yes - that number means the bug was fixed in build 15 of Solaris 7.
> 
> Can you associate this with a HW ??/99 or so? Would it be fixed by
> applying an MU?

Should have been fixed in Solaris 7 FCS as far as I can tell.  

Alan Burlison

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About