Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> writes: > >So it looks like we might get a speed kick from doing strtoul ourselves in >sv.c (as part of looks_like_number) hardwired for base 10. Sounds good - I was always slightly surprised it did not do it anyway. >As long as we don't mind losing locale based number grouping (whatever >that is, but it's compiled in in my copy of strtol - I disassembled it >and can see the pattern of code that's doing it) We only loose "locale based number grouping" for things that "look like numbers" in perl's view - so do we really loose anything? -- Nick Ing-Simmons <nik@tiuk.ti.com> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.Thread Previous | Thread Next