develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2000

Re: pp_add -> pp_i_add efficiency hack?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
December 3, 2000 15:01
Subject:
Re: pp_add -> pp_i_add efficiency hack?
Message ID:
20001203230139.A11283@pembro33.pmb.ox.ac.uk
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 09:47:59PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Well, it would be if I sent it. I'm tired and making mistakes now.

Without the patch:
u=2.31  s=0.38  cu=134.63  cs=11.73  scripts=261  tests=15242

With the patch:
u=2.32  s=0.3  cu=135.14  cs=11.67  scripts=261  tests=15242

Was it really worth it?

-- 
"Saving four times is just paranoia.  Unless you're using an Exabyte
 5gig/8mm tapedrive." - Graham Reed, ASR
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About