On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:17:31PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:01:42AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > Well, it's better than nothing, but is that enough for your purposes? > > I didn't think I had a "purpose" in mind. > I just found it rather scary that we can "ship" modules in the standard > library that don't even compile >>without anyone realising<< I can't argue with that... > I guess it's time to run the regression tests and then > find lib -type f | xargs ls -ltu > to find all that weren't accessed and add placeholder tests to at least > verify that they still load. > > Nicholas Clark -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack CohenThread Previous | Thread Next