Re: What was it layers were for again ?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:09:30PM +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> In the near term we need something to say "this stream provides/
> accepts UTF-8", and we need to go through and make C code honour that.
> But once that is done what else to we need to make UTF8 useful?

That's a good start; a stream that automagically sent things through Encode
would also be lovely.

-- 
Sometimes when you fill a vacuum, it still sucks.   -Rob Pike

• What was it layers were for again ? by Nick Ing-Simmons
• RE: What was it layers were for again ? by Horsley Tom
• RE: What was it layers were for again ? by Moore, Paul
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Gisle Aas
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Gisle Aas
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Bart Schuller
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Dan Sugalski
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: What was it layers were for again ? by Simon Cozens