Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:01:42AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Well, it's better than nothing, but is that enough for your purposes?

I didn't think I had a "purpose" in mind.
I just found it rather scary that we can "ship" modules in the standard
library that don't even compile >>without anyone realising<<

I guess it's time to run the regression tests and then 
find lib -type f | xargs ls -ltu
to find all that weren't accessed and add placeholder tests to at least
verify that they still load.

Nicholas Clark

• [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Simon Cozens
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Nicholas Clark
• net_hostent.t (was Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy?) by rspier
• Re: net_hostent.t (was Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy?) by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy? by Stephen P. Potter