develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from November 2000

Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
November 28, 2000 07:44
Subject:
Re: [ID 20001128.002] what's the point of example code if it is buggy?
Message ID:
20001128094340.A26991@chaos.wustl.edu
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:16:57AM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> 
> This is a bug report for perl from nick@talking.bollo.cx,
> generated with the help of perlbug 1.33 running under perl v5.7.0.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> [Please enter your report here]
> 
> What's the <expletive> point of example code if it's buggy?
> Not only do some of the perlipc code fail to compile in the first place,
> but even when you fix those bugs two have subtle precedence bugs w.r.t.
> "or" versus "||" and scalar/list context.
> 
> Bugs remaining
> 
> 1: I've no idea what the missing text after "We'll" should be:
> 
>        a time.  Multithreaded servers are covered in Chapter 6 of
>        the Camel.
> 
>        Here's the code.  We'll
> 
>        #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> 
> 
> 2: The example that follows uses Net::hostent. It's not working becuse
>    Net::hostent in bleadperl is shagged.
> 
> 3: Net::hostent doesn't have a regression test to detected that it's shagged.

Writing a portable test that still tests anything useful for the
gethost* is tough.  Remember that the contents or the existence of the
/etc/hosts file might be largely irrelevant to to results of the
gethost* calls.

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About