develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from November 2000

Re: sfio97 vs sfio2000

Thread Previous
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
November 14, 2000 08:32
Subject:
Re: sfio97 vs sfio2000
Message ID:
20001114103152.B5026@chaos.wustl.edu
> The block of tests which fail in lib/syslfs.t follow a seek() rather
> than a sysseek() - sfio97 is not large file aware so that fails.
> It is not clear to me if use of seek() vs sysseek() is a typo 
> in the test of if it is trying to prove buffered/unbuffered lfs seeks
> interoperate (which seems suspect to me...)

Mea culpa, It should be sysseek().

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About