develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from November 2000

Re: pp_add -> pp_i_add efficiency hack?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Jarkko Hietaniemi
November 11, 2000 17:03
Re: pp_add -> pp_i_add efficiency hack?
Message ID:
> Ah. I felt that UVIV and IVUV was not going to be simple, so assumed that

Healthy instintcs, there :-)

> However, it might be useful to go to the effort on IVUV and UVIV as it
> (with UVUV an IVIV) would make 64 bit arithmetic more sane on platforms
> where NV can't preserve all bits in IV. (I think.)

That's why I have been diddling many a time with the said code.

$jhi++; #
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About