Re: [PATCH] Re: [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594 on dos-djgpp djgpp

On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 08:57:31PM -0500, Peter J. Farley III wrote:
> At 10:01 PM 11/7/00 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> <Snipped>
>  >I think I prefer something like this, using the brand new
>  >d_fnctl_can_lock:
>  >  if ( !$Config{d_flock} &&
>  >       !$Config{d_fcntl_can_lock} &&
>  >       !$Config{d_lockf} ) {>
>  >
>  >This should work for dos, too?
> 
> Yes, this works fine for dos.  Patch applied, tested ok, pasted and 

I gazed into the future using my crystal ball and pre-emptively
already applied that as patch #7560 (plus cleanup as #7606)...

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

• [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594 on dos-djgpp djgpp by Peter J. Farley III
• Re: [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594 on dos-djgpp djgpp by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• [PATCH] Re: [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594on dos-djgpp djgpp by Peter J. Farley III
• Eudora and patches (was Re: [PATCH] Re: [ID ccyymmdd.nnn] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594) by sthoenna
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594 on dos-djgpp djgpp by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0+DEVEL7594 on dos-djgpp djgpp by Peter J. Farley III
• Re: [PATCH] Re: [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594 on dos-djgpp djgpp by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20001107.014] Not OK: perl v5.7.0 +DEVEL7594 ondos-djgpp djgpp by Peter J. Farley III