Re: Breaking recursive magic (was Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties?)

Daniel Chetlin wrote:

> > Is there anywhere for pp_tie to flag an object as active, so if you come
> > back to it via a loop (A-tiedto-A or anything more complex) it doesn't
> > use the tie method for a second (third (fourth (...))) trip?
> 
> This is the solution I'd like to see used for a chain of overloaded
> objects that loops infinitely, as well. But I don't know how to do it
> yet.

And I thought it was just me that was dumb for not being able to figure
it out ;-)

-- 
Alan Burlison

• When did self-ties break? by Alan Burlison
• Re: When did self-ties break? by Mark Mielke
• Re: When did self-ties break? by Alan Burlison
• Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Nicholas Clark
• Breaking recursive magic (was Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties?) by Daniel Chetlin
• Re: Breaking recursive magic (was Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties?) by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Alan Burlison
• Re: Did change 1307 (GSAR) break self ties? by Mark Mielke