Re: [ID 20000912.009] perlunicode.pod still mentions tr///CU

>I've just checked perl5.6's perlop and it happily mentions tr///CU as if
>nothing is going to happen. I assume that it would be a good idea to update
>this for 5.6.1 to say that this (experimental, because all unicode is 
>experimental?) feature is depreciated and will be removed in the 5.8
>release of perl.

>(except that I'm not convinced that the above is near to a good wording, hence
>no comprehensive search of the pods and patch)

FYI: the new Camel and Pockref intentionally mention them not at all,
as Larry pronounced them nasty and dead.  Probably better that the deed
were done earlier than later.

--tom

• Re: [ID 20000912.009] perlunicode.pod still mentions tr///CU by Tom Christiansen
• [ID 20000912.009] perlunicode.pod still mentions tr///CU by Nick Clark
• Re: [ID 20000912.009] perlunicode.pod still mentions tr///CU by sthoenna
• Re: [ID 20000912.009] perlunicode.pod still mentions tr///CU by Nicholas Clark
• tr///CU, and 5.6.1 by Gurusamy Sarathy