Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from September 2000
Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com> writes:
>
>Well, I thought so myself ("I need it fixed, so it's probabyl best if
>I write the patches myself instead of relying on the overworked perl
>hackers"), but even this does not work.....
It is all too easy for a pumpking to overlook something - now I am 'it'
for a week or two I am going to say up-front that I am not infallible,
have a Tk port to work on and a day job.
So I for one would like _anyone_ that has a "pending patch" to check that their "hot
issues" are fixed in snapshot/rsync/whatever and say
"seems the XYZ bug addressed by my patch of 10 October 1999 is still there".
We have a mechanism in Test.pm for tests which should work but which
don't yet. A patch that added one of those would be safe to apply even if
the patch that fixed the problem was not to hand.
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next