On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 02:39:53PM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > >> > Unicode 2.1 explicitly says that U+2019 is the preferred > >> > punctuation apostrophe > >> > >> And on that day when Perl and all the rest of my standard tools > >> begin to emit and process nothing but Unicode, on *that* day should > >> we heed this. Clearly, we're not there yet. > > >Yea, verily that is the way for a speedy transition to Unicode :-( > >Nay, I'm not proposing to change the quotes in pod output, that would > >be much premature. But such an attitude virtually guarantees we will > >all be using ASCII for many years to come. > > I cannot use a "vertical prime" to represent an apostrophe. > It looks embarrassingly nasty. Contractions and possessives > want a "raised comma", not a straight up and down mark. > > Since I'm writing in ASCII, I use the standard character > for the same. It's insane that the Unicode nazis have If this were USENET by Godwin's Extended Law I would declare this discussion now officially void, null, empty, pointless, and closed. > defined away an ASCII apostrophe. I've got one, and I'm > going to use it. I'm certainly not going to be emitting > U+2019 when I've virtually nothing that can cope with it. > > --tom -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack CohenThread Previous | Thread Next