Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?

At 05:21 +0100 2000-07-14, Hugo wrote:
>:I think it was Ilya's hopscotch patch:
>:
>:http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/cgi-bin/w3glimpse2html/perl5-porters/1999-11/msg005
>:53.html
>
>Unfortunately, no: that only moved the relevant section.

Well, there's 
<http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/1999-09/msg00901.html> 
too.  Or have you already discounted that?
-- 
Dominic Dunlop

• [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Per Lindquist
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by James E Keenan via RT
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jesse Luehrs via RT
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by M.J.T. Guy
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Dominic Dunlop
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Safari Blame report example [Was: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?] by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Rick Delaney