Safari Blame report example [Was: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?]

Hugo wrote:
> 
> It would help if I could determine which patch applied the change

Jarkko pegged it, here's how Safari shows it:

   http://slaysys.com/saf_dev/perl/-/-/depot/cfgperl/regexec.c?other_rev=%404556&file_mode=Blame#L1425

The odd part is that looking in the mainline //depot/perl/ branch
doesn't help, since the hopscotch patch was one of a huge bunch
of patches merged in in a huge jump.  This is not too uncommon,
so you will have to check in a couple of places sometimes, and
newer patches may obscure older ones, since the blame report only
shows the most recent change that affected a line.

- Barrie

• [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Per Lindquist
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by James E Keenan via RT
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jesse Luehrs via RT
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by M.J.T. Guy
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Dominic Dunlop
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Safari Blame report example [Was: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?] by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Rick Delaney