Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?

Hugo wrote:
> 
> Barrie Slaymaker's excellent source browser was great while it lasted

Glad you like it.  Here I was thinking that there was little interest
in it, but then I got a couple of nudges at YAPC about it and I'm
going to get back to debugging the next release.  It helps that it'll
be dogfood at a new company I'm joining.

> (or perhaps it just moved without me being aware of it - Barrie?),

It's been up & down a bit lately at

   http://slaysys.com/saf_dev/perl/-/-/   

I'm syncing it with the repository right now, I was going to fire up
a blame report for you to work with, but it looks like Jarkko
pointed you to the change number.

Barrie

• [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Per Lindquist
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by James E Keenan via RT
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jesse Luehrs via RT
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by M.J.T. Guy
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Dominic Dunlop
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Safari Blame report example [Was: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?] by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Rick Delaney