Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?

Hugo wrote:
> 
> It would help if I could determine which patch applied the change, and

I think it was Ilya's hopscotch patch:

http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/cgi-bin/w3glimpse2html/perl5-porters/1999-11/msg00553.html

> see the comments that accompanied it: if anyone knows of a way to
> discover this I would love to know of it.

I searched for "regexec.c check_substr" in the archives but I already
had an idea it was related to hopscotch.

Does that help?

-- 
Rick Delaney
rick.delaney@home.com

• [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Per Lindquist
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by James E Keenan via RT
• [perl #3423] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jesse Luehrs via RT
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by M.J.T. Guy
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Hugo
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Dominic Dunlop
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Safari Blame report example [Was: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403?] by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Barrie Slaymaker
• Re: [ID 20000626.002] Slow s/// in 5.6 compared to 5.00403? by Rick Delaney