develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2000

Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl

From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
May 26, 2000 08:23
Subject:
Re: Thoughts on maintaining perl
Message ID:
4.3.1.0.20000526111731.023cfb00@24.8.96.48
At 08:21 AM 5/26/00 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On Thu, 25 May 2000, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
>
> > Tom Christiansen [tchrist@chthon.perl.com] quoth:
> > *>more conceptual blindspots.  It's like knowing how to boil but not
> > *>fry.  Programming is not a skill one develops in five easy lessons.
> >
> > Indeed. But, what is it about Perl that attracts the sort of mythology it
> > has?
>
>The graduation from HTML monkey to CGI expert.

Poor instruction in the language. A friend of mine took a beginning CGI 
class at her university. The things she was getting taught were downright 
appalling, both from a perl perspective and a CGI perspective (If she 
wasn't in Montana I'dve driven out and smacked her instructor with a 
clue-by-four).

Part of the problem may be that you can survive and program in perl while 
still possessing a pathetic and possibly wildly wrong knowledge of the 
language (Purl Gurl, anyone?). In C, if you get it wrong it doesn't work. 
In perl, it still does, sorta.

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About