Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2000
>gist of it seemed to me to be that there should be some way of
>preventing the SCALAR slot of a glob from being changed, with the goal
>of making sure the read only SV can't even be replaced. This way lies
>madness. Do we go on to make sure the glob as a whole can't be
>changed, even locally? How about the package the glob is in? Do we
>bar the use of Safe when there are any constants lurking about that
>might suddenly become not so constant anymore?
Exactly. There's nothing stopping anyone from playing with the
symbol table directly. I can always play with $foo::{bar} directly,
or even copy all of %foo:: to %glarch::, save for the 'bar' entry,
and get my own, then replace $main::{foo} with $main::{glarch}.
Symbol tables are global. That means anybody can add a subroutine
to any package they want, for example, or delete it. People who
don't like this about Perl need to get over their personal hang-ups,
or else downgrade to a more B&D language. If you don't want to cahnge
a constant, than don't. But these fears that someone else WHO IS SOMEONE
INSIDE *YOUR* PROGRAM might go wickedly frobbing your stuff -- well,
that's the siege mentality problem. Get a new language.
--tom
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next