On Sat, May 06, 2000 at 08:31:22PM -0700, Gurusamy Sarathy wrote: > On Sat, 06 May 2000 21:52:07 EDT, Sam Tregar wrote: > >On Sat, 6 May 2000, Peter Scott wrote: > >> I thought we had already come up with a moderation scheme that appeared > >> reasonable? What are we waiting for? > > > >Some sort of appointment-from-above, I imagine. Sarathy - care to name a > >few moderators and give them appropriate list management access? Or are > >you waiting for nominees? > > Sorry I've been tuit-challenged lately. :-( > > We have overwhelming agreement on the need and the proposed "referee" > model. We need to decide who the referees are, and the logistics. > > Here are the nominees so far (in no particular order): > > Russ Allbery > Nathan Torkington > Chip Salzenberg > Mark-Jason Dominus > Damian Conway > Simon Cozens > Kurt Starsinic > > I haven't asked any of them if they are interested in being a referee. > I guess they should consider themselves asked. :-) So here I am, going on record as accepting. Let the games begin! Peace, * Kurt Starsinic (kstar@orientation.com) ---------- Senior Network Engineer * | "Everybody wants to be on a championship team, | | but nobody wants to practice." - Bobby Knight |Thread Previous | Thread Next