develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2000

Re: overloading = [a solution]

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Sam Tregar
Date:
May 7, 2000 11:24
Subject:
Re: overloading = [a solution]
Message ID:
Pine.LNX.4.21.0005071317050.2363-100000@zoltar.vm.com
On 7 May 2000, Simon Cozens wrote:

> Nick Ing-Simmons (lists.p5p):
> >Sam Tregar <sam@tregar.com> writes:
> >>What package supports people that don't want to know about the
> >>package? 
> >
> >Tk for one. I suspect the vast majority of its users have no idea 
> >what happens inside. 
> 
> *DB*_File, for another. You don't know what goes on in the package:
> you utter a magic line, and suddenly your hash is connected to a
> database. That's the whole *point* of tying.

Enough!  I didn't respond to Nick, thinking I'd just let the
misunderstanding slide; but now it's becoming a running joke!

Ilya (quoted out of context) was referring to the *API* for a prospective
package, critisizing it for requiring the user to learn to use it when he
thought 'tie' would be sufficient.  I responded (quoted out of context)
that no package supports users that don't learn the *API*.  This was meant
as a sort of rhetorical lead-in for a more reasonable response.

So, in response: no, neither Tk nor *DB*_File supports users that don't
want to know about the *API*.

-sam



Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About