Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2000
On Sat, 06 May 2000 21:52:07 EDT, Sam Tregar wrote:
>On Sat, 6 May 2000, Peter Scott wrote:
>> I thought we had already come up with a moderation scheme that appeared
>> reasonable? What are we waiting for?
>
>Some sort of appointment-from-above, I imagine. Sarathy - care to name a
>few moderators and give them appropriate list management access? Or are
>you waiting for nominees?
Sorry I've been tuit-challenged lately. :-(
We have overwhelming agreement on the need and the proposed "referee"
model. We need to decide who the referees are, and the logistics.
Here are the nominees so far (in no particular order):
Russ Allbery
Nathan Torkington
Chip Salzenberg
Mark-Jason Dominus
Damian Conway
Simon Cozens
Kurt Starsinic
I haven't asked any of them if they are interested in being a referee.
I guess they should consider themselves asked. :-)
The other thing is to figure out is the mechanics. Is the list software
capable of the style of admin we're thinking about? If not, what else
can we use? There also needs to be a list/alias that the referees can
use for behind-the-scenes communication. I'd also suggest that all the
refereeing activity be cc-ed to that list so the referees know that a
potential problem is being addressed by someone else.
Sarathy
gsar@ActiveState.com
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next