RE: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings

From: Gurusamy Sarathy [mailto:gsar@ActiveState.com]
 
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 10:25:08 PDT, I wrote:
> >Change 5934 by gsar@auger on 2000/04/24 17:16:54
> >
> >	propagate lexical warnings from surrounding scope correctly
> >	within string eval()
> 
> Wups, I missed the same fix that Paul had sent due to the different
subject
> line.  I've added his much improved testsuite for the same.

Thanks Sarathy.

Paul

• [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by Andreas J. Koenig
• Re: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by Gurusamy Sarathy
• RE: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by paul.marquess