Re: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings

On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 10:25:08 PDT, I wrote:
>Change 5934 by gsar@auger on 2000/04/24 17:16:54
>
>	propagate lexical warnings from surrounding scope correctly
>	within string eval()

Wups, I missed the same fix that Paul had sent due to the different subject
line.  I've added his much improved testsuite for the same.


Sarathy
gsar@ActiveState.com

• RE: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by paul.marquess
• [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by Andreas J. Koenig
• Re: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [ID 20000330.008] no warnings doesn't overrule use warnings by Gurusamy Sarathy