Todd C Miller <Todd.Miller@courtesan.com> writes: > Looks like there is still a problem. If you use: > C<-u> > Pod::Man will now output: > \f(CW\*(C`\-u\*(C'\fR > which, when formatted by nroff, still has the backslash in place. > Now granted, it makes more sense to us B<-u> (which doesn't have this > problem), but that's not the point :-) For a test case, the following > suffices: Which backslash? windlord:~> nroff -man - | uniq \f(CW\*(C`\-u\*(C'\fR -u That looks exactly right to me.... Maybe your nroff is broken? -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>Thread Previous | Thread Next