develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2000

Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
simon
Date:
April 5, 2000 06:26
Subject:
Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???
Message ID:
slrn8emfmo.r9.simon@othersideofthe.earth.li
Tom Christiansen (lists.p5p):
>>Well, that's what that patch was attempting to do.
>>I'll apply that, then write the new blurb on unitialised thingies.
>
>There are no "unitialised thingies".  There are merely scalar values
>which are undef.  One must banish the notion of definedness from
>one's mind when contemplating aggregates

You think I was attempting to be coherent when I sent that mail?

-- 
  "They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the
   Wright brothers.  But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown."
	 -- Carl Sagan
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About