develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2000

Re: Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???

From:
simon
Date:
April 5, 2000 06:19
Subject:
Re: Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???
Message ID:
slrn8emf9g.r9.simon@othersideofthe.earth.li
M.J.T. Guy (lists.p5p):
>You obviously misswed my bug report [ID 20000401.009], found in
>http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2000-04/msg00052.html
>in which this layout is corrected, and a couple of other bugs are
>mended.

I did indeed.

>Note also that because "use diagnostics" offsets the message, lines in
>perldiag.pod should be limited to 76 characters, and preferably to 72.

Well, that's what that patch was attempting to do.
I'll apply that, then write the new blurb on unitialised thingies.

-- 
"The best index to a person's character is a) how he treats people who can't 
do him any good and b) how he treats people who can't fight back."
-- Abigail Van Buren



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About