develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2000

Re: Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???

Thread Next
From:
M.J.T. Guy
Date:
April 5, 2000 06:17
Subject:
Re: Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???
Message ID:
E12cpg0-0004uN-00@taurus.cus.cam.ac.uk
simon@brecon.co.uk (Simon Cozens) wrote
> Grief, this message is already messy enough in a standard 80-column wide
> terminal. This patch makes things nicer for those of us still on glass
> TTYs:

You obviously misswed my bug report [ID 20000401.009], found in

http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2000-04/msg00052.html

in which this layout is corrected, and a couple of other bugs are
mended.

Note also that because "use diagnostics" offsets the message, lines in
perldiag.pod should be limited to 76 characters, and preferably to 72.


Mike Guy

Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About