>David Glasser (lists.p5p): >>Does this make anybody happy? > >A few (minor) changes would make me very happy indeed. In the spirit of not >exposing the internals to the ordinary user, I think we may want to >avoid talking about opcodes. Also, the error message is displayed by >perl, not by the program! :) Those are good changes, but do you really want to split "that " over a line break? (I should make a new patch but I'm too lazy to boot into linux. One of these days I'll start doing email over there.) >+in your program. For example, C<"that $foo"> is usually optimized into >C<"that >+" . $foo>, and the warning will refer to the C<concatenation (.)> operator, --David glasser@iname.comThread Previous | Thread Next