develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2000

Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
David Glasser
Date:
April 4, 2000 21:49
Subject:
Re: [ID 20000403.009] uninitialised concatenation???
Message ID:
l03130305b510756cf12d@[209.195.241.170]
>David Glasser (lists.p5p):
>>Does this make anybody happy?
>
>A few (minor) changes would make me very happy indeed. In the spirit of not
>exposing the internals to the ordinary user, I think we may want to
>avoid talking about opcodes. Also, the error message is displayed by
>perl, not by the program! :)

Those are good changes, but do you really want to split "that " over a line
break?

(I should make a new patch but I'm too lazy to boot into linux.  One of
these days I'll start doing email over there.)

>+in your program.  For example, C<"that $foo"> is usually optimized into
>C<"that
>+" . $foo>, and the warning will refer to the C<concatenation (.)> operator,

--David

glasser@iname.com
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About